The Boise National Forest is deliberately excluding taxpayers from public discussions on social media.
A federal judge has ruled that Donald Trump cannot block people on his Twitter feed and other social media accounts because those belong to the office of the President, and ultimately the American people themselves.
However, the Boise National Forest does not believe that they are held accountable to the same laws which the President of the United States must follow.
They block anyone of right-leaning political views who disagree with Forest Service lock-it-all-up-and-watch-it-all-burn policies.
Today, I served written notice to the Boise National Forest Supervisor that we will not stand for the Forest Service silencing our voices of concern for how our public lands are managed.
If you feel that the Boise National Forest has wrongfully silenced you on social media, please send a brief description of your concerns to Amos2500@yahoo.com
Here is a copy of the letter I sent the Boise National Forest Supervisor today:
Notice of intent to sue.
On or about August, 2017, I was blocked by the US Forest Service Boise National Forest Facebook page from discussing issues listed therein.
A recent landmark decision by a federal court stated that President Donald Trump cannot block people on his Twitter feed, because that feed belongs to a public office. And not the President as a private citizen.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-24/trump-twitter-blocking-ruling-is-bad-for-free-speech
The Forest Service is a wholly owned public entity, which means that the entirety of Facebook posts, Twitter and other social media accounts belong to taxpayers such as myself. And NOT to any one public servant or public entity.
If the Forest Service has not unblocked ALL users on said social media outlets within 30 days, I and several other concerned citizens intend to file a complaint in federal court to address grievances with your office for excluding taxpayers from public discussions.
Sincerely,
Scott Amos
208.297.0634
A federal judge has ruled that Donald Trump cannot block people on his Twitter feed and other social media accounts because those belong to the office of the President, and ultimately the American people themselves.
However, the Boise National Forest does not believe that they are held accountable to the same laws which the President of the United States must follow.
They block anyone of right-leaning political views who disagree with Forest Service lock-it-all-up-and-watch-it-all-burn policies.
Today, I served written notice to the Boise National Forest Supervisor that we will not stand for the Forest Service silencing our voices of concern for how our public lands are managed.
If you feel that the Boise National Forest has wrongfully silenced you on social media, please send a brief description of your concerns to Amos2500@yahoo.com
Here is a copy of the letter I sent the Boise National Forest Supervisor today:
Notice of intent to sue.
On or about August, 2017, I was blocked by the US Forest Service Boise National Forest Facebook page from discussing issues listed therein.
A recent landmark decision by a federal court stated that President Donald Trump cannot block people on his Twitter feed, because that feed belongs to a public office. And not the President as a private citizen.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-24/trump-twitter-blocking-ruling-is-bad-for-free-speech
The Forest Service is a wholly owned public entity, which means that the entirety of Facebook posts, Twitter and other social media accounts belong to taxpayers such as myself. And NOT to any one public servant or public entity.
If the Forest Service has not unblocked ALL users on said social media outlets within 30 days, I and several other concerned citizens intend to file a complaint in federal court to address grievances with your office for excluding taxpayers from public discussions.
Sincerely,
Scott Amos
208.297.0634
Should sue the FS as an entity at some point.
ReplyDeleteWhat happened to the land for the people.. the four service does not have any right or legal function and blocking people from you Civ government land that government does not own that land they were given that lanf
ReplyDelete..